Austin Krajicek vs Jarryd Chaplin Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L W L L L L
Form
L L W L L W L W L LHead To Head: Krajicek 1 - 0 Chaplin
They have played 2 sets in total, with Krajicek winning 2 and Chaplin winning 0. The last match between Krajicek and Chaplin was at the Drummondville Challenger, 12-03-2017, Q1 round, I.hard with Austin Krajicek getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Austin Krajicek | 1 |
| Jarryd Chaplin | 0 |
Drummondville Challenger(12-03-2017)
6
3
6
3
| Krajicek | Stats | Chaplin |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 94 | Highest Rank | 824 |
| 34 | Age | 33 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 0 |
| 56% (281-224) | Career Total W/L | 51% (73-71) |
| $320,031 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Andreeva VS Bouzkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shnaider VS Volynets PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Austin Krajicek
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
5
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
3
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 0:55:1 | Average Match Time | 0:55:1 |
| 80% (32/40) | 1st Serve % | 58% (37/64) |
| 91% (29/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (27/37) |
| 88% (7/8) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (9/27) |
| 33% (3/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (28/64) | Return Points Win % | 10% (4/40) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Austin Krajicek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Luis Patino
Player
Austin Krajicek
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Austin Krajicek
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
13
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
30 of
36)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
13 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
18 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Collin Altamirano
Player
Austin Krajicek
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
13
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
6
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Austin Krajicek
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Austin Krajicek
Player
Tiran Sanghera
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
41%
(
26 of
64)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
9
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Austin Krajicek
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
10
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Ignacio Londero
Player
Austin Krajicek
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
9
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
87
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Austin Krajicek
Player
Gonzalo Escobar
55%
(
62 of
112)
1st Serve %
69%
(
90 of
131)
18
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
84%
(
52 of
62)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
64 of
90)
50%
(
25 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
35 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
47 of
131)
124
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Austin Krajicek
Player
Alexios Halebian
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Austin Krajicek
Player
Shalva Dzhanashia
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jarryd Chaplin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Bradley Mousley
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
12
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
16 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jarryd Chaplin
Player
Jianhui Li
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adam El Mihdawy
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
40%
(
14 of
35)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jarryd Chaplin
Player
Christopher Rosensteel
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fabiano De Paula
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sekou Bangoura
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jarryd Chaplin
Player
Mark Oljaca
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Austin Krajicek
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
5
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
3
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (281/224) | Win/Loss | 51% (73/71) |
| 54% (636/542) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (162/161) |
| 51% (5871/5597) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1539/1481) |
| 58% (196/144) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (66/58) |
| 54% (28/24) | Clay Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) |
| 55% (48/40) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (5/8) |
| 36% (9/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.41 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 2273 | Aces Total | 268 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 920 | Total Double Faults | 219 |
| 1:3:2 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 640.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 129.55 |
| 62% (14600/23665) | 1st Serve % | 62% (1914/3095) |
| 73% (10647/14600) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (1347/1914) |
| 52% (4681/9065) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (536/1181) |
| 36% (722/2000) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (75/210) |
| 36% (8464/23758) | Return Points Win % | 34% (984/2904) |
| 36% (8/14) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (7/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (32/29) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (128/124) | Challenger W/L | 28% (9/23) |
| 68% (106/50) | Futures W/L | 58% (64/47) |
| 56% (274/492) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (73/143) |
| 44% (4/9) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (110/199) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (16/45) |
| 55% (88/161) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (20/36) |
| 84% (288/242) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (75/64) |
| 16% (288/46) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (75/10) |
| 18% (217/39) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (69/9) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
